This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"
Мужчина ворвался в прямой эфир телеканала и спустил штаны20:53，详情可参考同城约会
如何实现内外联通、互促共进？稳步扩大制度型开放，海南自贸港启动全岛封关运作，高质量共建“一带一路”……，详情可参考体育直播
It's time to add AI protections to your will
Hopeful Monsters is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读