I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.，更多细节参见Line官方版本下载
Депутат ЕП также призвал прекратить действие программы «Цифровая Куба», на реализацию которой ЕС выделил три миллиона евро.，详情可参考快连下载安装
Old English is certainly its own language, with its own grammar, vocab, and idioms. And it does need to be studied as a different language - even now I feel like I have only scratched it's surface.